Tag Archives: data collection

4 Free Market Research Tools [Infographic]


They say there is no such thing as a free lunch. However, in our hallowed digital age there exists plenty of free hacks when you need support or an extra angle. This includes market research.

These hacks might be more and more necessary. In a recent Greenbook post, researcher Neil Cole explains the why and how market research budgets are being sliced across the very world. In essence, companies have a tendency to slice the long-term (sound research on a brand) and keep the short-term (sales, broader marketing, advertising). So it’s safe the say that market research hacks could be useful until the common wisdom (if you want to call it that) shifts and companies once again invest fully in market research. Of course these free tools are useful for smaller companies or virgin startups.

Therefore, we present you our latest infographic, 4 Free Market Research Tools, based on our article 15 Free Market Research Tools & Resources. We hope you find the means for more quality data and branding in either of these sources (and maybe more money for lunch or department budgets):

4 Free Market Research Tools infographic


Download this infographic.

Embed Our Infographic On Your Site!

Do YOU Have A Perfect March Madness Bracket?

The excitement of March Madness is upon us and hopefully you have your 2015 NCAA Basketball Tournament bracket perfected to win in your office pool. Kentucky is the number one seed to win after going 34-0 in the regular season, with Villanova being the number one seed in the East, Duke in the South, and Wisconsin as top pick in the West.

Whether it’s based on your favorites, which mascots could beat who, or going off of President Obama’s, everyone has a different strategy on who to pick for their brackets. But what are the odds of actually getting the perfect bracket and correctly predicting every game in the tournament?

1 in 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (that’s 9.2 quintillion).

With odds being that high, it was pretty smart of Quicken Loans, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire-Hathaway, and Yahoo to offer a $1 billion prize to the fan who correctly picked all 64 winners in the 2014 NCAA men’s college basketball tournament last year. None of the contestants made it past the first round of 32 games without at least one mistake. They have since decide not to continue the contest this year. Sorry, guys. If it helps, the odds of becoming a billionaire without the help of Mr. Warren Buffett and Yahoo are only 1 in 7,000,000! See, there’s a silver lining in everything.

Since you’re probably not going to predict every game in the tournament correctly this year (I know, I know, but never lose hope), here’s a list of things that are more likely to happen to you than getting the perfect NCAA Basketball Tournament bracket:

  • Odds of fatally slipping in the bath or shower – 1 in 2,323
  • Odds of dating a supermodel – 1 in 88,000
  • Odds of being struck by lightning this year – 1 in 700,000
  • Odds of having identical twins –1 in 350-400
  • Odds of winning $1,000 in the McDonald’s Monopoly game — 1 in 36,950,005
  • Odds of being on plane with a drunken pilot – 117 to 1
  • Odds of tripping while texting – 1 in 10
  • Odds of getting a royal flush in poker on first five cards dealt – 649,740 to 1
  • Odds of “getting lucky” on the first date – 1 in 3
  • Odds of finding a pearl in an oyster — 1 in 12,000
  • Odds of going blind after laser eye surgery — 1 in 85,714
  • Odds of winning the Mega Millions lottery — 1 in 135,145,920

The odds of betting perfectly, or any odds for that matter, will not hamper the excitement of this or any NCAA Tournament. In sports there are those amazing, historical moments, like the Miracle on Ice and The Music City Miracle. These are once time events, though. In the NCAA Tournament, it seems that there is a yearly miracle of some sort, memorable to the entire nation. Just don’t expect one of them to be getting rich like Warren Buffet by predicting perfect bracket and correctly predicting every game in the tournament.


Make sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube page, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.


Empathy for the Devil that is Writing Survey Questionnaires

A bad dream for those crafting questionnaires for online surveys might go as follows:

Panel members take an online survey critiquing a previous online survey they participated, and that you wrote. The results are overwhelmingly negative. The panel members hate it and admit they offered slapdash information that will not assist in research.

You don’t have to wake up. It hasn’t happened…yet…but if you want to avoid this reality it’s wise to understand two concepts in order to craft the best possible questionnaire. The first one is:

Respondent fatigue

Also known as survey fatigue, respondent fatigue basically refers to the mental state when respondents become weary during an online survey, to the point their answers are rushed and even dishonest—thereby reducing statistical accuracy. Furthermore, an article in Great Brook explains that:

Fatigue means that those with extreme views are more likely to respond, leading to a serious survey bias, known as non-response bias. That is, those who don’t respond likely have different views from those who do. The survey data that winds up in the survey data base don’t properly reflect all customers’ views. The data are biased.

Respondent fatigue can be seen as more of a direct threat than just a negative aspect of online surveys. The New York Times reported that respondent fatigue has caused “declining response rates over the last decade.”

A chief reason for respondent fatigue is the length and wordiness of a survey, and science supports this. A study found survey fatigue often sets in after 20 minutes of a survey. It states: “They found survey respondents exert less effort and spend less time thinking about their answers as respondents get deeper into the survey.”

Here is a breakdown chart from research on revealing the risks of longer surveys:

Study on online survey respondent fatigue

As qSample’s own Director of Business Development, Connor Duffey, said: “Respondents will look at the scrolling bar during a survey. If it’s not moving fast enough for them, respondent fatigue becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

Duffey further said that a sound way to get around respondent fatigue—even if a questionnaire has to be extensive —is by simply placing the most relevant questions at the beginning. Also, never taking incentive to respondents for granted is also important, Duffey added.

Length, clarity, and approachability are effective tools to combat respondent fatigue, but ultimately are not enough. The second notion is essential:


Putting yourself in a respondent’s shoes goes a long way into getting into their minds and hearts. Sharing their interests is not enough, but understanding that online respondents are real people with busy lives and little time (just like you). They are just as essential as those above you seeking data, and just as part of the process.

qSample’s own president Rudly Raphael encapsulated this issue in a recent interview:

Companies need to have more empathy for the research participant. The person(s) who writes the survey instrument should ask themselves if they could sit through that survey for 25-30 minutes. Companies should make surveys fun and engaging, regardless of the topic. They should test their surveys over and over again to identify the fatigue points in the survey. This is usually the area where data integrity is compromised.

There are sensible solutions that qSample, along with other data research companies, proffer to cultivate empathy with respondents:

–  Be communicative from the beginning—as in explaining the number of questions, privacy policies, and purpose of the online survey. Communicating survey results during the survey is also an effective of holding respondent interest.
–  Use more than one panel for the same survey or even future ones to ensure they are fresh. Often, companies pass around panels to different departments, and it wears them out.
–   Ask yourself if every question is absolutely necessary—if you were to personally take it in a real-time event (on your smartphone, waiting for the train, for example)—and get rid of anything else.

In addition, there are practical techniques that can increase empathy and improve the overall architecture of a questionnaire. For example, Duffey states that minimizing matrices questions is a vital tactic to producing efficient questionnaires, as they tend to exhaust respondents and produce sloppy answers. Another expert in the online survey industry called matrices: “The laziest type of survey writing.”

An additional practical technique is including more opt-out choices, as explained by market research expert :

This is usually in the form of a “Don’t Know,” “Not Sure” or “Undecided.” Not only will adding the opt-out choice eliminate a lot of inaccurate answers from your study, but it will also provide you with valuable information. You can learn how many people have not made up their mind or are uneducated on a topic.

Of course, there are other issues that compromise online surveys—such as response acquiescence (the tendency to agree with survey questions regardless of content) and respondent bias (the inability to answer survey questions because of perceived social pressure). These issues can be moderated by various means that online survey providers should be able to recommend; they are commonly addressed by tweaking questions and providing some safeguards in the programming of the questionnaire software platform.

However, having empathy is an alpha and omega for the best possible questionnaire, certainly for decreasing respondent fatigue. This should not be surprising, in the end, as empathy is the solution to so many other problems, in both the virtual and real world.

How to write the best possible online survey